CPU
GPU
GeForce 240M GT
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 240M GT is positioned at rank #575 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 240M GT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 240M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 600.
| Insight | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 240M GT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 240M GT and Intel UHD Graphics 600
GeForce 240M GT
The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 600
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the Intel UHD Graphics 600 reaches 312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 320+3% | 312 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+124% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+12% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 240M GT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 has 0 MB. The GeForce 240M GT offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12+19% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs QSV. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | QSV |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | QSV |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 75% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 55°C-31% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.7 | 20.8+114% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 240M GT launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 costs 100+% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.0 (GeForce 240M GT) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 240M GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #847 | #703 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 240M GT and Intel UHD Graphics 600
