GeForce 240M GT
Intel UHD Graphics 600
GeForce 240M GT vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 240M GT vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 240M GT vs Intel UHD Graphics 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 240M GT
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 240M GT is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
Intel UHD Graphics 600
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 240M GT vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 240M GT
The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 600
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the Intel UHD Graphics 600 reaches 312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 320+3% | 312 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+124% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+12% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 240M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 240M GT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 carries 0 MB. GeForce 240M GT gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 600.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12+19% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs QSV. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | QSV |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | QSV |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 75% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 55°C-31% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.7 | 20.8+114% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 600 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 240M GT (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #847 | #703 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 240M GT and Intel UHD Graphics 600
