UHD Graphics 600 vs RADEON HD6370D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs RADEON HD6370D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs RADEON HD6370D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 600

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

RADEON HD6370D

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Intel UHD Graphics 600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON HD6370D is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON HD6370D is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (320 vs 312), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON HD6370D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD6370D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs RADEON HD6370D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 600

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

RADEON HD6370D

The RADEON HD6370D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 scores 312 and the RADEON HD6370D reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is built on Generation 8.0 while the RADEON HD6370D uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 1,536 (RADEON HD6370D). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6370D). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	RADEON HD6370D
G3D Mark Score	312	320+3%
Architecture	Generation 8.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	1536+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4032 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+570%
Boost Clock	1050 MHz+19%	880 MHz
ROPs	3	32+967%
TMUs	24	96+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	RADEON HD6370D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6370D carries 512 MB. RADEON HD6370D gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 600 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6370D.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	RADEON HD6370D
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 draws 15W versus the RADEON HD6370D's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 350W (RADEON HD6370D). Power connectors: Integrated vs Legacy.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	RADEON HD6370D
TDP	15W-94%	250W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Legacy
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	55°C	—
Perf/Watt	20.8+1500%	1.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 600 came in at $0, while the RADEON HD6370D launched at $50. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 600 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 6.4 (RADEON HD6370D) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	RADEON HD6370D
MSRP	$0-100%	$50
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	6.4
Codename	Broadwell GT2	Cayman
Release	September 5 2014	December 14 2010
Ranking	#703	#596

Search Intel UHD Graphics 600 on Amazon

Search RADEON HD6370D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.