UHD Graphics 600 vs Radeon R5E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 600.

Insight	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon R5E
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R5E remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel UHD Graphics 600 Benchmark Check

Radeon R5E Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Radeon R5E

Intel UHD Graphics 600

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

Radeon R5E

The Radeon R5E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 scores 312 and the Radeon R5E reaches 315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon R5E uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 512 (Radeon R5E). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R5E).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon R5E
G3D Mark Score	312	315
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	512+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4032 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+103%
ROPs	3	16+433%
TMUs	24	32+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon R5E
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5E has 512 MB. The Radeon R5E offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon R5E
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R5E). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon R5E
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R5E). Decoder: QSV vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R5E).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon R5E
Encoder	QSV	VCE 2.0
Decoder	QSV	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 draws 15W versus the Radeon R5E's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 0W (Radeon R5E). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 75.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon R5E
TDP	15W	15W
Recommended PSU	1W	0W-100%
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	55°C-27%	75
Perf/Watt	20.8	21.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R5E launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 6.4 (Radeon R5E) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon R5E
MSRP	$0	$0
Avg Price (30d)	$0-100%	$49
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	6.4
Codename	Broadwell GT2	Cape Verde
Release	September 5 2014	December 20 2013
Ranking	#703	#738