FirePro V3800
Intel UHD Graphics 600
FirePro V3800 vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V3800 vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro V3800 vs Intel UHD Graphics 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V3800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V3800 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌393.3% higher power demand at 74W vs 15W.
Intel UHD Graphics 600
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 74W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V3800 vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro V3800
The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.
Intel UHD Graphics 600
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V3800 scores 321 and the Intel UHD Graphics 600 reaches 312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V3800) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600).
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 321+3% | 312 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+317% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+174% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V3800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 carries 0 MB. FirePro V3800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3800 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 600.
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V3800) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V3800) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs QSV. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V3800) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600).
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | QSV |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | QSV |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V3800 draws 74W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 132.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3800) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 55°C.
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 55°C-31% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3 | 20.8+384% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V3800 came in at $129, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 600 was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V3800) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Juniper | Broadwell GT2 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #780 | #703 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V3800 and Intel UHD Graphics 600
