Quadro FX 3500M vs Radeon R1E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Radeon R1E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Radeon R1E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500M

2008

Why buy it

✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1160% higher power demand at 189W vs 15W.

Radeon R1E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 189W, a 174W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (306 vs 301), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R1E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 55nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3500M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 3500M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R1E has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Radeon R1E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3500M

The Quadro FX 3500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 306 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R1E

The Radeon R1E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 301 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3500M scores 306 and the Radeon R1E reaches 301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3500M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R1E uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 128 (Radeon R1E). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon R1E).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon R1E
G3D Mark Score	306+2%	301
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	240+88%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+10%	0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+700%	4
TMUs	80+900%	8
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon R1E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500M and 64-bit on the Radeon R1E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 2 MB (Radeon R1E) — the Radeon R1E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon R1E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 12 (Radeon R1E). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon R1E
DirectX	9.0c	12+33%
OpenGL	2.1	4.5+114%
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3500M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R1E). Decoder: VP1 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 3500M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC (Radeon R1E).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon R1E
Encoder	None	VCE 2.0
Decoder	VP1	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500M draws 189W versus the Radeon R1E's 15W — a 170.6% difference. The Radeon R1E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 350W (Radeon R1E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon R1E
TDP	189W	15W-92%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	1.6	20.1+1156%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R1E (2023 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon R1E
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GT200B	Dragon Range
Release	November 11 2008	January 3 2023
Ranking	#815	#843

Search Quadro FX 3500M on Amazon

Search Radeon R1E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.