Quadro FX 3500M vs Radeon RX 5300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Radeon RX 5300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Radeon RX 5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 59.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Radeon RX 5300

2020

Why buy it

✅771.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 5300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 771.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2385.6% in PassMark G3D (7,606 vs 306), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro FX 3500M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 5300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Radeon RX 5300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3500M

The Quadro FX 3500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 306 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon RX 5300

The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3500M scores 306 versus the Radeon RX 5300's 7,606 — the Radeon RX 5300 leads by 2385.6%. The Quadro FX 3500M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon RX 5300
G3D Mark Score	306	7,606+2386%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	1408+487%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	4.632 TFLOPS+645%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	88+10%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5300 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro FX 3500M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon RX 5300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 carries 3 GB. Radeon RX 5300 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500M and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon RX 5300
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	3 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	96-bit+50%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon RX 5300
DirectX	9.0c	12.1+34%
OpenGL	2.1	4.6+119%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3500M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: VP1 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 3500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon RX 5300
Encoder	None	VCN 2.0
Decoder	VP1	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500M draws 189W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 61.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon RX 5300
TDP	189W	100W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	180mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	1.6	76.1+4656%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 5300 (2020 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Radeon RX 5300
MSRP	—	$129
Codename	GT200B	Navi 14
Release	November 11 2008	May 28 2020
Ranking	#815	#336

Search Quadro FX 3500M on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 5300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.