Quadro FX 360M vs Mobility Radeon X1600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 360M is positioned at rank 408 and the Mobility Radeon X1600 is on rank 650, so the Quadro FX 360M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 360M

#393

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

86900%

#408

Quadro FX 360M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#409

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

100%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

94%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

94%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

71%

#416

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

59%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

53%

#418

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

47%

#419

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

47%

#420

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

41%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

35%

#422

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

35%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

29%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1600

#639

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

5775%

#641

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

5235%

#642

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

5221%

#646

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

4748%

#647

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

4715%

#649

GeForce 9400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#650

Mobility Radeon X1600

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#651

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

100%

#652

GeForce 9600M GS

MSRP: $70|Avg: $20

99%

#653

Mobility Radeon HD 4200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $45

99%

#654

Mobility Radeon HD 3470

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#655

GeForce 8800 GT

MSRP: $249|Avg: $25

98%

#656

GeForce 8400

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

96%

#657

GeForce 9800M GTS

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

95%

#658

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

95%

#659

GeForce 8600 GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

95%

#660

Radeon HD 2900 GT

MSRP: $170|Avg: $15

91%

#661

Radeon HD 8280E

MSRP: $150|Avg: $110

91%

#662

Radeon R5 M420

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

89%

#663

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

89%

#664

Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon X1600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 360M.

Insight	Quadro FX 360M	Mobility Radeon X1600
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+5.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon X1600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 360M Benchmark Check

Mobility Radeon X1600 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 360M and Mobility Radeon X1600

Quadro FX 360M

The Quadro FX 360M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 87 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Mobility Radeon X1600

The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 360M scores 87 versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 92 — the Mobility Radeon X1600 leads by 5.7%. The Quadro FX 360M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon X1600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 360M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 360M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600).

Feature	Quadro FX 360M	Mobility Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score	87	92+6%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	800+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+80%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 360M	Mobility Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 360M	Mobility Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 360M draws 189W versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 360M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.