
Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro FX 370M

Quadro FX 360M
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 370M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 360M is positioned at rank 408 and the Quadro FX 370M is on rank 354, so the Quadro FX 370M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 360M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 370M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 360M.
| Insight | Quadro FX 360M | Quadro FX 370M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 370M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 360M and Quadro FX 370M

Quadro FX 360M
The Quadro FX 360M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 87 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 370M
The Quadro FX 370M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 93 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 360M scores 87 versus the Quadro FX 370M's 93 — the Quadro FX 370M leads by 6.9%. The Quadro FX 360M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 370M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 360M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 360M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 360M | Quadro FX 370M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 87 | 93+7% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 360M | Quadro FX 370M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 360M | Quadro FX 370M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 360M draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 370M's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 360M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 360M | Quadro FX 370M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











