Quadro FX 370M vs RADEON X800 XT
Quadro FX 370M
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 370M is positioned at rank 354 and the RADEON X800 XT is on rank 368, so the Quadro FX 370M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370M
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 XT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON X800 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 370M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 370M.
| Insight | Quadro FX 370M | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X800 XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 370M and RADEON X800 XT
Quadro FX 370M
The Quadro FX 370M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 93 points. Launch price was $3,499.
RADEON X800 XT
The RADEON X800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 370M scores 93 versus the RADEON X800 XT's 98 — the RADEON X800 XT leads by 5.4%. The Quadro FX 370M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X800 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 370M) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 XT). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370M) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 XT).
| Feature | Quadro FX 370M | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 93 | 98+5% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 4608+1820% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS+3234% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 80 | 288+260% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 370M | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 370M) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 XT) — the RADEON X800 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 370M | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 370M draws 189W versus the RADEON X800 XT's 300W — a 45.4% difference. The Quadro FX 370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 370M) vs 350W (RADEON X800 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 370M | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-37% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+67% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 370M | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $20 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #815 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 370M and RADEON X800 XT
