Quadro FX 380 vs GeForce G100
Quadro FX 380
Popular choices:
GeForce G100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 380 is positioned at rank 327 and the GeForce G100 is on rank 247, so the GeForce G100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce G100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The GeForce G100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 380 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce G100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 380 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce G100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce G100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 198.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 380 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+198.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 380 and GeForce G100
Quadro FX 380
The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce G100
The GeForce G100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 176 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 380 scores 177 and the GeForce G100 reaches 176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 380 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce G100 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 380) vs 384 (GeForce G100). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G100).
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 177 | 176 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+81% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 380 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce G100 has 512 MB. The GeForce G100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 380) vs 512 KB (GeForce G100) — the GeForce G100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 380) vs 10.0 (GeForce G100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 380 draws 189W versus the GeForce G100's 30W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce G100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 380) vs 350W (GeForce G100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 30W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 5.9+556% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 380 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce G100 launched at $40 and now averages $5. The GeForce G100 costs 66.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.8 (Quadro FX 380) vs 35.2 (GeForce G100) — the GeForce G100 offers 198.3% better value. The GeForce G100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $40-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8 | 35.2+198% |
| Codename | GT200B | GP108 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #815 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 380 and GeForce G100
