Quadro FX 380
VS
GeForce GT 325M

Quadro FX 380 vs GeForce GT 325M

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

2013Core: 980 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 380 is positioned at rank 327 and the GeForce GT 325M is on rank 274, so the GeForce GT 325M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380

#312
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
10783%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#328
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
100%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
95%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
94%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
93%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
93%
#335
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
93%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
92%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
91%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
91%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
90%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
85%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
84%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M

#264
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
639%
#266
579%
#267
577%
#271
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
525%
#272
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
521%
#274
GeForce GT 325M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
100%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
99%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
99%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
97%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
96%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
94%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 325M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 380GeForce GT 325M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+4.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 38.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 380GeForce GT 325M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+38.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 380 and GeForce GT 325M

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380

The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 380 scores 177 and the GeForce GT 325M reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 380 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GT 325M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 380) vs 384 (GeForce GT 325M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M).

FeatureQuadro FX 380GeForce GT 325M
G3D Mark Score
177+4%
170
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.7526 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+150%
32
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 380GeForce GT 325M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 380 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 325M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro FX 380GeForce GT 325M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
1 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 380) vs 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 380GeForce GT 325M
DirectX
10_0
11 (10_1)+10%
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 380 draws 189W versus the GeForce GT 325M's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 380) vs 350W (GeForce GT 325M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 380GeForce GT 325M
TDP
189W
50W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
0.9
3.4+278%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 380 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.8 (Quadro FX 380) vs 8.5 (GeForce GT 325M) — the Quadro FX 380 offers 38.8% better value. The GeForce GT 325M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 380GeForce GT 325M
MSRP
$129
Avg Price (30d)
$15-25%
$20
Performance per Dollar
11.8+39%
8.5
Codename
GT200B
GK107
Release
November 11 2008
June 25 2013
Ranking
#815
#726