CPU
GPU
Quadro FX 4000
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4000 is positioned at rank 423 and the GeForce 9300GE is on rank 644, so the Quadro FX 4000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300GE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9300GE is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 9300GE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9300GE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4000 | GeForce 9300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300GE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300GE holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 223.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4000 | GeForce 9300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+223.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4000 and GeForce 9300GE
Quadro FX 4000
The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.
GeForce 9300GE
The GeForce 9300GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4000 scores 101 and the GeForce 9300GE reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 9300GE uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4000) vs 384 (GeForce 9300GE). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300GE).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4000 | GeForce 9300GE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 101+3% | 98 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 0.7227 TFLOPS+56% |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4000 | GeForce 9300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4000 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9300GE has 512 MB. The GeForce 9300GE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300GE) — the GeForce 9300GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4000 | GeForce 9300GE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4000 draws 150W versus the GeForce 9300GE's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 9300GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4000) vs 350W (GeForce 9300GE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4000 | GeForce 9300GE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 33W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 3.0+329% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 4000 launched at $2199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 9300GE launched at $50 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9300GE costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Quadro FX 4000) vs 6.5 (GeForce 9300GE) — the GeForce 9300GE offers 225% better value. The GeForce 9300GE is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4000 | GeForce 9300GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199 | $50-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 6.5+225% |
| Codename | GT200B | GM108 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #884 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 4000 and GeForce 9300GE
