Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
2008Why buy it
- β 3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (14 vs 18).
- β2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- β204.8% higher power demand at 189W vs 62W.
Quadro FX 2000
2010Why buy it
- β +28.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 62W instead of 189W, a 127W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 2000
The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI scores 14 versus the Quadro FX 2000's 18 β the Quadro FX 2000 leads by 28.6%. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 2000 uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 192 (Quadro FX 2000). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14 | 18+29% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+25% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+30% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2000 carries 128 MB. Quadro FX 500/600 PCI gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2000.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+3100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 2000's 62W β a 101.2% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 62W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.3+200% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 2000 launched at $3000. On MSRP, Quadro FX 500/600 PCI was 100+% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 2000) β the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is Quadro FX 2000 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.0 |
| Codename | GT200B | GF106 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #815 | #902 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















