Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2000

2010Core: 625 MHz

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14 vs 18).
  • ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ❌204.8% higher power demand at 189W vs 62W.

Quadro FX 2000

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…+28.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 62W instead of 189W, a 127W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 2000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 28.6% in PassMark G3D (18 vs 14), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 2000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 500/600 PCI has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Quadro FX 2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2000

The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI scores 14 versus the Quadro FX 2000's 18 β€” the Quadro FX 2000 leads by 28.6%. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 2000 uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 192 (Quadro FX 2000). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000).

FeatureQuadro FX 500/600 PCIQuadro FX 2000
G3D Mark Score
14
18+29%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240+25%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS+30%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+150%
32
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 500/600 PCIQuadro FX 2000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2000 carries 128 MB. Quadro FX 500/600 PCI gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2000.

FeatureQuadro FX 500/600 PCIQuadro FX 2000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+3100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 2000's 62W β€” a 101.2% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 500/600 PCIQuadro FX 2000
TDP
189W
62W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.3+200%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 2000 launched at $3000. On MSRP, Quadro FX 500/600 PCI was 100+% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 2000) β€” the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is Quadro FX 2000 (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 500/600 PCIQuadro FX 2000
MSRP
$0-100%
$3000
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.0
Codename
GT200B
GF106
Release
November 11 2008
December 24 2010
Ranking
#815
#902

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.