Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs RADEON XPRESS 200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs RADEON XPRESS 200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

2008

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14 vs 23).
❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

2020

Why buy it

✅+64.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON XPRESS 200M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON XPRESS 200M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 64.3% in PassMark G3D (23 vs 14), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON XPRESS 200M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON XPRESS 200M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI scores 14 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the RADEON XPRESS 200M leads by 64.3%. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score	14	23+64%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	2560+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS+748%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 500/600 PCI gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI and 64-bit on the RADEON XPRESS 200M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
DirectX	9_0a	9_0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI draws 189W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
TDP	189W	50W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	168mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.5+400%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON XPRESS 200M (2020 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GT200B	Navi 12
Release	November 11 2008	June 15 2020
Ranking	#815	#283

Search Quadro FX 500/600 PCI on Amazon

Search RADEON XPRESS 200M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.