Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

96%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

94%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

91%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

91%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

89%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

82%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

79%

#210

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3212%

#225

RADEON XPRESS 200M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

99%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

98%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

94%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

80%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 64.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-64.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+64.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON XPRESS 200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI Benchmark Check

RADEON XPRESS 200M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 500/600 PCI and RADEON XPRESS 200M

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI scores 14 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the RADEON XPRESS 200M leads by 64.3%. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score	14	23+64%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	2560+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS+748%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	RADEON XPRESS 200M
DirectX	9_0a	9_0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI draws 189W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.