
Quadro FX 500/FX 600 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M

Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Popular choices:

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is positioned at rank 425 and the GeForce4 440 Go 64M is on rank 741, so the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 440 Go 64M.
| Insight | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 500/FX 600 and GeForce4 440 Go 64M

Quadro FX 500/FX 600
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8+33% | 6 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+14% | 0.5445 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 draws 189W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 142.1% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 32W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | GT200B | GK107 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #815 | #903 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














