Quadro FX 500/FX 600 vs GeForce FX 5600

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008Core: 610 MHz

GeForce FX 5600

2011Core: 810 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

+62.5%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is positioned at rank 425 and the GeForce FX 5600 is on rank 380, so the GeForce FX 5600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 500/FX 600

#410

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

738650%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

100%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

50%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5600

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

103629%

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

99557%

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

98400%

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

98229%

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

98029%

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

97471%

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

96243%

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

95886%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

95000%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

94743%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

93600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

93400%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

91714%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

91657%

#364

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

114286%

#379

GeForce FX 5600XT

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

100%

#380

GeForce FX 5600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $10

100%

#381

GeForce3 Ti 200

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

43%

#382

GeForce4 Ti 4200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $5

43%

#383

GeForce4 Ti 4800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

29%

#384

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

29%

#385

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

29%

#386

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

29%

#387

GeForce4 Ti 4600

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

29%

#388

RADEON 7500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

29%

#389

GeForce3 Ti 500

MSRP: $349|Avg: $49

14%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX 5600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 62.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 500/FX 600	GeForce FX 5600
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-62.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+62.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce FX 5600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 143.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro FX 500/FX 600	GeForce FX 5600
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+143.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Benchmark Check

GeForce FX 5600 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 500/FX 600 and GeForce FX 5600

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce FX 5600

The GeForce FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 scores 8 versus the GeForce FX 5600's 13 — the GeForce FX 5600 leads by 62.5%. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce FX 5600 uses Rankine, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 336 (GeForce FX 5600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600).

Feature	Quadro FX 500/FX 600	GeForce FX 5600
G3D Mark Score	8	13+63%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Rankine
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	336+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.089 TFLOPS+75%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+43%	56
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 500/FX 600	GeForce FX 5600
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5600 has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 512 KB (GeForce FX 5600) — the GeForce FX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/FX 600	GeForce FX 5600
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 draws 189W versus the GeForce FX 5600's 150W — a 23% difference. The GeForce FX 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/FX 600	GeForce FX 5600
TDP	189W	150W-21%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	—	180mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce FX 5600 launched at $200 and now averages $10. The GeForce FX 5600 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 1.3 (GeForce FX 5600) — the GeForce FX 5600 offers 160% better value. The GeForce FX 5600 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).