Quadro FX 500/FX 600
VS
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

Quadro FX 500/FX 600 vs GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

2011Core: 823 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is positioned at rank 425 and the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is on rank 377, so the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 500/FX 600

#410
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
738650%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
100%
#426
Quadro FX 2000
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40
50%
#427
GRID V100-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
0%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
80600%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
77433%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
76533%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
76400%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
76244%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
75811%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
74856%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
74578%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
73889%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
73689%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
72800%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
72644%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
71333%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
71289%
#362
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
88889%
#377
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
100%
#378
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
100%
#379
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
89%
#380
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
78%
#381
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
78%
#382
GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $5
33%
#383
GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
33%
#384
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
22%
#385
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
22%
#386
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
22%
#387
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
22%
#388
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
22%
#389
RADEON 7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
22%
#390
GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP: $349|Avg: $49
11%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 112.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 500/FX 600GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-112.5%)
Leading raw performance (+112.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+3100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 59.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 500/FX 600GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+59.4%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 500/FX 600 and GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 scores 8 versus the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra's 17 — the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra leads by 112.5%. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 384 (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra).

FeatureQuadro FX 500/FX 600GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
G3D Mark Score
8
17+113%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Rankine
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.263 TFLOPS+103%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+25%
64
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 500/FX 600GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra has 128 MB. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 512 KB (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 500/FX 600GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+3100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 draws 189W versus the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra's 160W — a 16.6% difference. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureQuadro FX 500/FX 600GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
TDP
189W
160W-15%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
190mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra launched at $199 and now averages $20. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 0.8 (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra offers 60% better value. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 500/FX 600GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP
$449
$199-56%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-25%
$20
Performance per Dollar
0.5
0.8+60%
Codename
GT200B
GF114
Release
November 11 2008
January 25 2011
Ranking
#815
#580