Quadro FX 550 vs Radeon X1300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 550 vs Radeon X1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 550 vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 550

2008

Why buy it

✅+10.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌89% higher power demand at 189W vs 100W.

Radeon X1300

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Quadro FX 550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 100W instead of 189W, a 89W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (58 vs 64).
❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 550 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 10.3% in PassMark G3D (64 vs 58), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon X1300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 35.9% (0.6 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 550 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 550 vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 550

The Quadro FX 550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 64 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon X1300

The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 550 scores 64 versus the Radeon X1300's 58 — the Quadro FX 550 leads by 10.3%. The Quadro FX 550 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 550) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 550) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300).

Feature	Quadro FX 550	Radeon X1300
G3D Mark Score	64+10%	58
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	1408+487%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	4.632 TFLOPS+645%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	88+10%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 550	Radeon X1300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 550 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 carries 256 MB. Radeon X1300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 550 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 550) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 550	Radeon X1300
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 550 draws 189W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 61.6% difference. The Radeon X1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 550) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 550	Radeon X1300
TDP	189W	100W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.6+100%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 550 came in at $150, while the Radeon X1300 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon X1300 was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 550) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 offers 50% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 550	Radeon X1300
MSRP	$150	$100-33%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	0.6+50%
Codename	GT200B	Navi 14
Release	November 11 2008	May 28 2020
Ranking	#815	#336

Search Quadro FX 550 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.