
Quadro FX 570 vs GeForce GT 415

Quadro FX 570
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 415
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 570 is positioned at rank 330 and the GeForce GT 415 is on rank 224, so the GeForce GT 415 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 415
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 415 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 570 | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 570 | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 570 and GeForce GT 415

Quadro FX 570
The Quadro FX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce GT 415
The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 570 scores 258 and the GeForce GT 415 reaches 251 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 570 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GT 415 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570) vs 144 (GeForce GT 415). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570) vs 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415).
| Feature | Quadro FX 570 | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 258+3% | 251 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+67% | 144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+50% | 0.4147 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 570 | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 570 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 415 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 415 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570) vs 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) — the GeForce GT 415 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 570 | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 570 draws 189W versus the GeForce GT 415's 70W — a 91.9% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570) vs 350W (GeForce GT 415). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 570 | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 70W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 3.6+157% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 570 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GT 415 launched at $49 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Quadro FX 570) vs 16.7 (GeForce GT 415) — the Quadro FX 570 offers 3% better value. The GeForce GT 415 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 570 | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $49-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2+3% | 16.7 |
| Codename | GT200B | GF116 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 14 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #849 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















