Quadro FX 570 vs Quadro FX 3500

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 570 vs Quadro FX 3500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 570 vs Quadro FX 3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 570 vs Quadro FX 3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 570

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 682.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 703.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,599 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (265 vs 258), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 570 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,400 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 682.3% (1.3 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 3500 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 570 vs Quadro FX 3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570

The Quadro FX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 570 scores 258 and the Quadro FX 3500 reaches 265 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 570 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 3500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500).

FeatureQuadro FX 570Quadro FX 3500
G3D Mark Score
258
265+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
240
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 570Quadro FX 3500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 570 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500.

FeatureQuadro FX 570Quadro FX 3500
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 570 draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 3500's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 3500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 570Quadro FX 3500
TDP
189W
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
1.4
1.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 570 came in at $199, while the Quadro FX 3500 launched at $1599. On MSRP, Quadro FX 570 was 87.6% cheaper ($1400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (Quadro FX 570) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) — the Quadro FX 570 offers 550% better value.

FeatureQuadro FX 570Quadro FX 3500
MSRP
$199-88%
$1599
Performance per Dollar
1.3+550%
0.2
Codename
GT200B
GT200B
Release
November 11 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#815
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.