Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 4650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 4650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
184.3% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4650

2010

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 173.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 570 instead at 258 vs 248, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $129 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 173.3% (3.5 vs 1.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 570 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 4650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 570

The Quadro FX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 4650

The Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 248 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 570 scores 258 and the Radeon HD 4650 reaches 248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 570 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 4650). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650).

Feature	Quadro FX 570	Radeon HD 4650
G3D Mark Score	258+4%	248
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	1408+487%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.253 TFLOPS+262%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	88+10%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 570	Radeon HD 4650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 570 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4650 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4650 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 570 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4650. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 4650) — the Radeon HD 4650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 570	Radeon HD 4650
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	1 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 570 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 4650's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 570	Radeon HD 4650
TDP	189W-6%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	1.4+17%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 570 came in at $199, while the Radeon HD 4650 launched at $70. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4650 was 64.8% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (Quadro FX 570) vs 3.5 (Radeon HD 4650) — the Radeon HD 4650 offers 169.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 4650 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 570	Radeon HD 4650
MSRP	$199	$70-65%
Performance per Dollar	1.3	3.5+169%
Codename	GT200B	Cayman
Release	November 11 2008	December 14 2010
Ranking	#815	#623

Search Quadro FX 570 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.