Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 8240

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8240

2012Core: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 8240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 8240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 8240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 570

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 298% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8240

2012

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 279.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 570 instead at 258 vs 246, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 279.5% (4.9 vs 1.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 570 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon HD 8240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570

The Quadro FX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 8240

The Radeon HD 8240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 246 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 570 scores 258 and the Radeon HD 8240 reaches 246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 570 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8240). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8240).

FeatureQuadro FX 570Radeon HD 8240
G3D Mark Score
258+5%
246
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.56 TFLOPS+312%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 570Radeon HD 8240
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 570 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8240 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 8240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 570 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8240. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8240) — the Radeon HD 8240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 570Radeon HD 8240
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 570 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8240's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 570Radeon HD 8240
TDP
189W-6%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
1.4+17%
1.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 570 came in at $199, while the Radeon HD 8240 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8240 was 74.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (Quadro FX 570) vs 4.9 (Radeon HD 8240) — the Radeon HD 8240 offers 276.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8240 (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 570Radeon HD 8240
MSRP
$199
$50-75%
Performance per Dollar
1.3
4.9+277%
Codename
GT200B
Pitcairn
Release
November 11 2008
March 5 2012
Ranking
#815
#460

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.