
Quadro FX 580 vs Radeon HD 6230

Quadro FX 580
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 580 is positioned at rank 355 and the Radeon HD 6230 is on rank 273, so the Radeon HD 6230 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 580
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6230
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6230.
| Insight | Quadro FX 580 | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6230 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6230 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $500), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4844.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 580 | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4844.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 580 and Radeon HD 6230

Quadro FX 580
The Quadro FX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 181 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 6230
The Radeon HD 6230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 580 scores 181 and the Radeon HD 6230 reaches 179 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 580 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6230 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 580) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6230). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 580) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6230).
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 181+1% | 179 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1280+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+209% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 580) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6230) — the Radeon HD 6230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 580 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6230's 186W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 580) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 186W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 580 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon HD 6230 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 6230 costs 98% less ($490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (Quadro FX 580) vs 17.9 (Radeon HD 6230) — the Radeon HD 6230 offers 4375% better value. The Radeon HD 6230 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $50-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $10-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 17.9+4375% |
| Codename | GT200B | Cayman |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















