Quadro FX 880M vs GeForce GT 415
Quadro FX 880M
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 415
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 880M is positioned at rank 127 and the GeForce GT 415 is on rank 224, so the Quadro FX 880M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 880M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 415
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 415 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 880M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 880M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 415 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 880M and GeForce GT 415
Quadro FX 880M
The Quadro FX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce GT 415
The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 880M scores 237 versus the GeForce GT 415's 251 — the GeForce GT 415 leads by 5.9%. The Quadro FX 880M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GT 415 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 880M) vs 144 (GeForce GT 415). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 880M) vs 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415).
| Feature | Quadro FX 880M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 237 | 251+6% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+67% | 144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+50% | 0.4147 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 880M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 880M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 415 has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 880M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 880M) vs 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) — the GeForce GT 415 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 880M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 880M draws 189W versus the GeForce GT 415's 70W — a 91.9% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 880M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 415). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 880M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 70W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3 | 3.6+177% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 415 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 880M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | GT200B | GF116 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 14 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #849 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 880M and GeForce GT 415
