
Quadro GV100
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W6800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro GV100
2018Why buy it
- ✅1.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌221.5% HIGHER MSRP$8,999 MSRPvs$2,799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Radeon Pro W6800X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,200 less on MSRP ($2,799 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 204.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($2,799 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GV100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quadro GV100
2018Radeon Pro W6800X
2021Why buy it
- ✅1.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,200 less on MSRP ($2,799 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 204.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($2,799 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌221.5% HIGHER MSRP$8,999 MSRPvs$2,799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GV100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro GV100 better than Radeon Pro W6800X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W6800X make more sense than Quadro GV100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 85 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 810 FPS |
| medium | 684 FPS | 648 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 642 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 513 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 202 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GV100 and Radeon Pro W6800X

Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
The Quadro GV100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 27 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1132 MHz to 1627 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,013 points. Launch price was $8,999.

Radeon Pro W6800X
Radeon Pro W6800X
The Radeon Pro W6800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2087 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,000 points. Launch price was $2,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro GV100 scores 19,013 versus the Radeon Pro W6800X's 18,000 — the Quadro GV100 leads by 5.6%. The Quadro GV100 is built on Volta while the Radeon Pro W6800X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Quadro GV100) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Raw compute: 16.66 TFLOPS (Quadro GV100) vs 16.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6800X). Boost clocks: 1627 MHz vs 2087 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,013+6% | 18,000 |
| Architecture | Volta | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+33% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.66 TFLOPS+4% | 16.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1627 MHz | 2087 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 128+33% | 96 |
| TMUs | 320+33% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 10 MB+1233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 32 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GV100) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon Pro W6800X) — a 77.8% advantage for the Quadro GV100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro GV100) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6800X) — the Quadro GV100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+78% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+1500% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro GV100) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Quadro GV100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6800X).
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GV100 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro W6800X's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon Pro W6800X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro GV100) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6800X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1 | 90.0+18% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GV100 launched at $8999 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W6800X launched at $2799. The Radeon Pro W6800X costs 68.9% less ($6200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro W6800X) — the Radeon Pro W6800X offers 204.8% better value. The Radeon Pro W6800X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8999 | $2799-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 6.4+205% |
| Codename | GV100 | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 27 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #89 | #158 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












