G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro GV100 vs RTX A4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro GV100 vs RTX A4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro GV100

2018

Why buy it

✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
710% HIGHER MSRP
$8,999 MSRPvs$1,111 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
❌78.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 140W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

RTX A4000

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,888 less on MSRP ($1,111 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 729.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 140W instead of 250W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GV100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro GV100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A4000 instead at 19,463 vs 19,013, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 12nm, 48 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A4000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,888 cheaper on MSRP at $1,111 vs $8,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 729.2% (17.5 vs 2.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro GV100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro GV100 vs RTX A4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro GV100

The Quadro GV100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 27 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1132 MHz to 1627 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,013 points. Launch price was $8,999.

RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro GV100 scores 19,013 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GV100 is built on Volta while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Quadro GV100) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 16.66 TFLOPS (Quadro GV100) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1627 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	Quadro GV100	RTX A4000
G3D Mark Score	19,013	19,463+2%
Architecture	Volta	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	5120	6144+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.66 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS+15%
Boost Clock	1627 MHz+4%	1560 MHz
ROPs	128+33%	96
TMUs	320+67%	192
L1 Cache	10 MB+67%	6 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+50%	4 MB
Tensor Cores	640+233%	192

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro GV100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro GV100	RTX A4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro GV100 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 carries 16 GB. Quadro GV100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GV100) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 128.6% advantage for the Quadro GV100. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Quadro GV100 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro GV100) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the Quadro GV100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro GV100	RTX A4000
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
Memory Type	HBM2	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	1024 GB/s+129%	448 GB/s
Bus Width	4096-bit+2033%	192-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+50%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro GV100	RTX A4000
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro GV100) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Quadro GV100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).

Feature	Quadro GV100	RTX A4000
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro GV100 draws 250W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 56.4% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro GV100) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro GV100	RTX A4000
TDP	250W	140W-44%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	76.1	139.0+83%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro GV100 came in at $8999, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. On MSRP, RTX A4000 was 87.7% cheaper ($7888 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 offers 733.3% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4000 (2021 vs 2018).

Feature	Quadro GV100	RTX A4000
MSRP	$8999	$1111-88%
Performance per Dollar	2.1	17.5+733%
Codename	GV100	GA104
Release	March 27 2018	April 12 2021
Ranking	#89	#85

Search Quadro GV100 on Amazon

Search RTX A4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.