
Quadro GV100 vs TITAN Xp

Quadro GV100
Popular choices:

TITAN Xp
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GV100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro GV100 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro GV100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN Xp lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro GV100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (32 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the TITAN Xp.
| Insight | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Volta (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN Xp offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $8,999 for the Quadro GV100, it costs 98% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 5817% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5817%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,999) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GV100 and TITAN Xp

Quadro GV100
The Quadro GV100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 27 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1132 MHz to 1627 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,013 points. Launch price was $8,999.

TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GV100 scores 19,013 and the TITAN Xp reaches 18,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GV100 is built on Volta while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Quadro GV100) vs 3,840 (TITAN Xp). Raw compute: 16.66 TFLOPS (Quadro GV100) vs 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp). Boost clocks: 1627 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,013+1% | 18,752 |
| Architecture | Volta | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+33% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.66 TFLOPS+37% | 12.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1627 MHz+3% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+33% | 96 |
| TMUs | 320+33% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 10 MB+614% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GV100 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN Xp has 12 GB. The Quadro GV100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GV100) vs 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) — a 87% advantage for the Quadro GV100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro GV100) vs 3 MB (TITAN Xp) — the Quadro GV100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+167% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+87% | 547.7 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+967% | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 12.0 (TITAN Xp). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro GV100) vs NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Quadro GV100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp).
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GV100 draws 250W versus the TITAN Xp's 250W — a 0% difference. The TITAN Xp is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro GV100) vs 600W (TITAN Xp). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1+1% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GV100 launched at $8999 MSRP and currently averages $8999, while the TITAN Xp launched at $1199 and now averages $150. The TITAN Xp costs 98.3% less ($8849 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 125.0 (TITAN Xp) — the TITAN Xp offers 5852.4% better value. The Quadro GV100 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8999 | $1199-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8999 | $150-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 125.0+5852% |
| Codename | GV100 | GP102 |
| Release | March 27 2018 | April 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #89 | #87 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














