Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R7 250X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R7 250X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R7 250X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅79.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R7 250X

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K3100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K3100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 79.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (2,283 vs 2,269), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K3100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 250X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K3100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R7 250X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon R7 250X

The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K3100M scores 2,283 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K3100M) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
G3D Mark Score	2,283	2,269
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+20%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.084 TFLOPS	1.216 TFLOPS+12%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	64 KB	160 KB+150%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K3100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250X carries 2 GB. Quadro K3100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K3100M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K3100M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the Quadro K3100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K3100M draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 6.5% difference. The Quadro K3100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3100M) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
TDP	75W-6%	80W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	210mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	30.4+7%	28.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 250X (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
MSRP	—	$99
Codename	GK104	Cape Verde
Release	July 23 2013	February 13 2014
Ranking	#653	#655

Search Quadro K3100M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 250X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.