Quadro K3100M vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U

NVIDIA

Quadro K3100M

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 38.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K3100M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K3100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K3100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U instead at 2,330 vs 2,283, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K3100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K3100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U

The Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,330 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K3100M scores 2,283 and the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U reaches 2,330 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K3100M) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U). Raw compute: 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U).

FeatureQuadro K3100MRadeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
G3D Mark Score
2,283
2,330+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.084 TFLOPS
1.843 TFLOPS+70%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
64+100%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K3100MRadeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K3100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U carries 0 MB. Quadro K3100M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K3100M and System on the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U.

FeatureQuadro K3100MRadeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K3100M draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3100M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro K3100MRadeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
30.4
155.3+411%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K3100MRadeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK104
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
July 23 2013
October 26 2017
Ranking
#653
#721

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.