GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro K3100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro K3100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro K3100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅14.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 768 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K3100M instead at 2,283 vs 2,275, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro K3100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the Quadro K3100M reaches 2,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the Quadro K3100M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 768 (Quadro K3100M). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro K3100M
G3D Mark Score	2,275	2,283
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	768+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS	1.084 TFLOPS+19%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	448 KB+600%	64 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K3100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro K3100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3100M carries 4 GB. Quadro K3100M gives you 433.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 and 64-bit on the Quadro K3100M.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro K3100M
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB	4 GB+433%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the Quadro K3100M's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Quadro K3100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 350W (Quadro K3100M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro K3100M
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	14.2	30.4+114%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K3100M (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro K3100M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GF104	GK104
Release	July 12 2010	July 23 2013
Ranking	#652	#653

Search GeForce GTX 460 on Amazon

Search Quadro K3100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.