
FirePro V8800

GeForce GTX 460
FirePro V8800 vs GeForce GTX 460 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V8800 vs GeForce GTX 460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V8800 vs GeForce GTX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V8800
2010Why buy it
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 768 MB).
- ✅Draws 74W instead of 160W, a 86W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌653.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 460
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 651.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌116.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 74W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V8800 vs GeForce GTX 460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V8800
The FirePro V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,281 points. Launch price was $479.

GeForce GTX 460
The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8800 scores 2,281 and the GeForce GTX 460 reaches 2,275 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 460 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V8800) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V8800) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460).
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,281 | 2,275 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+138% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+22% | 0.9072 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 448 KB+460% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V8800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V8800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 carries 768 MB. FirePro V8800 gives you 433.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8800 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro V8800) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460) — the GeForce GTX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+433% | 0.75 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8800) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 460).
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8800 draws 74W versus the GeForce GTX 460's 160W — a 73.5% difference. The FirePro V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8800) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-54% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.8+117% | 14.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V8800 came in at $1499, while the GeForce GTX 460 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 460 was 86.7% cheaper ($1300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro V8800) vs 11.4 (GeForce GTX 460) — the GeForce GTX 460 offers 660% better value.
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $199-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 11.4+660% |
| Codename | Juniper | GF104 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | July 12 2010 |
| Ranking | #780 | #652 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














