FirePro V8800 vs Radeon R9 M470

FirePro V8800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M470

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V8800 vs Radeon R9 M470 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V8800 vs Radeon R9 M470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V8800

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 328.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M470

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 337.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M470 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (2,331 vs 2,281), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V8800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M470 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,149 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 337.7% (6.7 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M470 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V8800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V8800 vs Radeon R9 M470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V8800

The FirePro V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,281 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

Radeon R9 M470

The Radeon R9 M470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,331 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V8800 scores 2,281 and the Radeon R9 M470 reaches 2,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M470 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V8800) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M470). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V8800) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470).

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon R9 M470
G3D Mark Score
2,281
2,331+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+4%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
48+20%
L1 Cache
80 KB
192 KB+140%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon R9 M470
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M470.

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon R9 M470
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V8800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R9 M470's 75W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon R9 M470
TDP
74W-1%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
30.8
31.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V8800 came in at $1499, while the Radeon R9 M470 launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M470 was 76.7% cheaper ($1149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro V8800) vs 6.7 (Radeon R9 M470) — the Radeon R9 M470 offers 346.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M470 (2016 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon R9 M470
MSRP
$1499
$350-77%
Performance per Dollar
1.5
6.7+347%
Codename
Juniper
Emerald
Release
April 26 2010
May 15 2016
Ranking
#780
#649

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.