FirePro V8800 vs Radeon HD 6970M

FirePro V8800

2010Core: 690 MHz

Radeon HD 6970M

2011Core: 680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro V8800

2,281

+0.5%

Radeon HD 6770

Radeon Vega 10

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Radeon HD 6970M

2,270

0.0%

Radeon HD 6770

Radeon Vega 10

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V8800 is positioned at rank 319 and the Radeon HD 6970M is on rank 121, so the Radeon HD 6970M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V8800

#304

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9719%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

100%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

100%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

99%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

97%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

93%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

93%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

91%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

91%

#327

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

90%

#328

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

90%

#329

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

88%

#330

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

86%

#331

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

85%

#332

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

84%

#334

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6970M

#111

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

287%

#113

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

260%

#114

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

259%

#118

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

236%

#119

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

234%

#121

Radeon HD 6970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $48

100%

#123

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#125

GeForce GT 550M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V8800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6970M.

Insight	FirePro V8800	Radeon HD 6970M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6970M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6970M holds the technical lead. Priced at $48 (vs $100), it costs 52% less, resulting in a 107.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro V8800	Radeon HD 6970M
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+107.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)	✅More affordable ($48)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro V8800 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 6970M Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V8800 and Radeon HD 6970M

FirePro V8800

The FirePro V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,281 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon HD 6970M

The Radeon HD 6970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,270 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V8800 scores 2,281 and the Radeon HD 6970M reaches 2,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6970M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V8800) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6970M). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V8800) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970M).

Feature	FirePro V8800	Radeon HD 6970M
G3D Mark Score	2,281	2,270
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	960+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+18%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	48+20%
L1 Cache	80 KB	192 KB+140%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V8800	Radeon HD 6970M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V8800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6970M has 2 GB. The FirePro V8800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro V8800) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6970M) — the Radeon HD 6970M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro V8800	Radeon HD 6970M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V8800 draws 74W versus the Radeon HD 6970M's 75W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro V8800	Radeon HD 6970M
TDP	74W-1%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	30.8+2%	30.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6970M costs 52% less ($52 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (FirePro V8800) vs 47.3 (Radeon HD 6970M) — the Radeon HD 6970M offers 107.5% better value. The Radeon HD 6970M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).