FirePro V8800
VS
Radeon HD 5970

FirePro V8800 vs Radeon HD 5970

FirePro V8800

2010Core: 690 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5970

2009Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V8800 is positioned at rank #319 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V8800

#304
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9719%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
100%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
100%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
99%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
97%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
93%
#324
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
93%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
91%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
91%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
90%
#328
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
90%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
85%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
84%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 5970 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V8800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
Standard Size (305mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 5970 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5970 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $100), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0.7%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V8800 and Radeon HD 5970

AMD

FirePro V8800

The FirePro V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,281 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

Radeon HD 5970

The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V8800 scores 2,281 and the Radeon HD 5970 reaches 2,297 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 5970 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V8800) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V8800) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970).

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
G3D Mark Score
2,281
2,297
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
1600 ×2+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS
2.32 TFLOPS ×2+110%
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
40
80 ×2+100%
L1 Cache
80 KB
320 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V8800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5970 has 2 GB. The FirePro V8800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro V8800) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5970) — the Radeon HD 5970 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V8800) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5970). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
DirectX
11.2
11.2
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V8800) vs None (Radeon HD 5970). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5970).

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V8800 draws 74W versus the Radeon HD 5970's 294W — a 119.6% difference. The FirePro V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8800) vs 650W (Radeon HD 5970). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90.

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
TDP
74W-75%
294W
Recommended PSU
350W-46%
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
305mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C-6%
90
Perf/Watt
30.8+295%
7.8
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro V8800 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon HD 5970 launched at $699 and now averages $100. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (FirePro V8800) vs 23.0 (Radeon HD 5970) — the Radeon HD 5970 offers 0.9% better value. The FirePro V8800 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureFirePro V8800Radeon HD 5970
MSRP
$1499
$699-53%
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$100
Performance per Dollar
22.8
23.0
Codename
Juniper
Hemlock
Release
April 26 2010
November 18 2009
Ranking
#780
#651