FirePro V8800 vs Quadro K3100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V8800 vs Quadro K3100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V8800 vs Quadro K3100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V8800

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K3100M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (2,283 vs 2,281), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V8800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro V8800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K3100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro V8800 vs Quadro K3100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V8800

The FirePro V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,281 points. Launch price was $479.

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V8800 scores 2,281 and the Quadro K3100M reaches 2,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro K3100M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V8800) vs 768 (Quadro K3100M). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V8800) vs 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M).

Feature	FirePro V8800	Quadro K3100M
G3D Mark Score	2,281	2,283
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+4%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS+2%	1.084 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	80 KB+25%	64 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V8800	Quadro K3100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8800 and 64-bit on the Quadro K3100M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro V8800) vs 512 KB (Quadro K3100M) — the Quadro K3100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro V8800	Quadro K3100M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V8800 draws 74W versus the Quadro K3100M's 75W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8800) vs 350W (Quadro K3100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro V8800	Quadro K3100M
TDP	74W-1%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	30.8+1%	30.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K3100M (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro V8800	Quadro K3100M
MSRP	$1499	—
Codename	Juniper	GK104
Release	April 26 2010	July 23 2013
Ranking	#780	#653

Search FirePro V8800 on Amazon

Search Quadro K3100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.