
GeForce GTX 460

Radeon HD 5970
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 5970 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 5970 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 5970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 247.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 294W, a 134W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5970 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 5970
2009Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌251.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌83.8% higher power demand at 294W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 5970 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460
The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon HD 5970
The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the Radeon HD 5970 reaches 2,297 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 5970 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,275 | 2,297 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 1600 ×2+376% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9072 TFLOPS | 2.32 TFLOPS ×2+156% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80 ×2+43% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+40% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5970 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5970 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 5970 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5970.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB | 2 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 460) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5970).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | — | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 5970's 294W — a 59% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 650W (Radeon HD 5970). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-46% | 294W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 305mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.2+82% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 came in at $199, while the Radeon HD 5970 launched at $699. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 460 was 71.5% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 3.3 (Radeon HD 5970) — the GeForce GTX 460 offers 245.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 460 (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-72% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4+245% | 3.3 |
| Codename | GF104 | Hemlock |
| Release | July 12 2010 | November 18 2009 |
| Ranking | #652 | #651 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














