GeForce GTX 460
VS
Radeon HD 5970

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 5970

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460

2010Core: 675 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5970

2009Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 5970 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (2 GB vs 768 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460.

InsightGeForce GTX 460Radeon HD 5970
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+166.7%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (305mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $100), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 296.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 460Radeon HD 5970
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+296.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 and Radeon HD 5970

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

Radeon HD 5970

The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the Radeon HD 5970 reaches 2,297 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 5970 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460Radeon HD 5970
G3D Mark Score
2,275
2,297
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
336
1600 ×2+376%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9072 TFLOPS
2.32 TFLOPS ×2+156%
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
56
80 ×2+43%
L1 Cache
448 KB+40%
320 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 460Radeon HD 5970
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5970 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 5970 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460Radeon HD 5970
VRAM Capacity
0.75 GB
2 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 460) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5970).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460Radeon HD 5970
Encoder
None
Decoder
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 5970's 294W — a 59% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 650W (Radeon HD 5970). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460Radeon HD 5970
TDP
160W-46%
294W
Recommended PSU
450W-31%
650W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
305mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
14.2+82%
7.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 460 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon HD 5970 launched at $699 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 460 costs 75% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 91.0 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 23.0 (Radeon HD 5970) — the GeForce GTX 460 offers 295.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 460 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460Radeon HD 5970
MSRP
$199-72%
$699
Avg Price (30d)
$25-75%
$100
Performance per Dollar
91.0+296%
23.0
Codename
GF104
Hemlock
Release
July 12 2010
November 18 2009
Ranking
#652
#651