GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 6970M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 6970M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 6970M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅30.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Radeon HD 6970M

2011

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (2,275 vs 2,270), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 6970M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon HD 6970M

The Radeon HD 6970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,270 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the Radeon HD 6970M reaches 2,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 6970M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6970M). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon HD 6970M
G3D Mark Score	2,275	2,270
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	336	960+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+44%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	448 KB+133%	192 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6970M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon HD 6970M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6970M carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6970M gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 and System on the Radeon HD 6970M.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon HD 6970M
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB	2 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 6970M's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon HD 6970M
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	14.2	30.3+113%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6970M (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon HD 6970M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GF104	Blackcomb
Release	July 12 2010	January 4 2011
Ranking	#652	#654

Search GeForce GTX 460 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6970M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.