
GeForce GTX 460

Radeon R9 M470
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R9 M470 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R9 M470 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R9 M470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460
2010Why buy it
- ✅74.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 71.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M470
2016Why buy it
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 768 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌75.9% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R9 M470 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460
The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon R9 M470
The Radeon R9 M470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,331 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the Radeon R9 M470 reaches 2,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M470 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M470). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,275 | 2,331+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 768+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9072 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS+69% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+133% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M470 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M470 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M470 gives you 433.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M470. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M470) — the GeForce GTX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB | 4 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M470's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 14.2 | 31.1+119% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 M470 launched at $350. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 460 was 43.1% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 6.7 (Radeon R9 M470) — the GeForce GTX 460 offers 70.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M470 (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-43% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4+70% | 6.7 |
| Codename | GF104 | Emerald |
| Release | July 12 2010 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #652 | #649 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














