FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GTX 460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GTX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GTX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W6150M

2015

Why buy it

✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 768 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W6150M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (2,358 vs 2,275), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W6150M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 768 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W6150M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GTX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W6150M

The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W6150M scores 2,358 and the GeForce GTX 460 reaches 2,275 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W6150M is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 460 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W6150M) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460). Raw compute: 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460).

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 460
G3D Mark Score	2,358+4%	2,275
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768+129%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.651 TFLOPS+82%	0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	48	56+17%
L1 Cache	192 KB	448 KB+133%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W6150M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W6150M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 carries 768 MB. FirePro W6150M gives you 433.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W6150M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W6150M) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460) — the GeForce GTX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 460
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+433%	0.75 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 460).

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 460
Encoder	VCE 2.0	—
Decoder	UVD 4.2	—
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W6150M draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 460's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The FirePro W6150M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W6150M) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 460
TDP	150W-6%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	82mm	—
Height	105mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	15.7+11%	14.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro W6150M (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 460
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	Saturn	GF104
Release	November 12 2015	July 12 2010
Ranking	#646	#652

Search FirePro W6150M on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.