FirePro 3D V8800
FirePro W6150M
FirePro 3D V8800 vs FirePro W6150M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V8800 vs FirePro W6150M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro 3D V8800 vs FirePro W6150M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V8800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 74W instead of 150W, a 76W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.
FirePro W6150M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 74W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V8800 vs FirePro W6150M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro 3D V8800
The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.
FirePro W6150M
The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the FirePro W6150M reaches 2,358 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro W6150M uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 768 (FirePro W6150M). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,438+3% | 2,358 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+4% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 1.651 TFLOPS+50% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 48+20% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V8800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W6150M carries 4 GB. FirePro W6150M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8800 and 64-bit on the FirePro W6150M.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (FL12_0)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro 3D V8800) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the FirePro W6150M's 150W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 350W (FirePro W6150M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-51% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 105mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9+110% | 15.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is FirePro W6150M (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | — |
| Codename | Juniper | Saturn |
| Release | April 26 2010 | November 12 2015 |
| Ranking | #780 | #646 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V8800 and FirePro W6150M
