Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GT 1030

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W6150M

2015Core: 1075 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1030

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GT 1030 Performance Spectrum

FirePro W6150M
4 GB 150
2,358
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 4870 X2
brand logoRadeon 630
brand logoRadeon R9 M360
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon 780M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 6800S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
GeForce GT 1030
2 GB 30
2,407
+2.1%
brand logoGeForce GTS 450
brand logoGeForce GTX 555
brand logoGeForce GTX 675M
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
brand logoRTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GT 1030: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W6150M

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Measures 82mm instead of 145mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

GeForce GT 1030

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌76.8% longer card at 145mm vs 82mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 1030 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (2,407 vs 2,358), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W6150M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 1030 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 1030 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W6150M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GT 1030 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W6150M

The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1030

The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W6150M scores 2,358 and the GeForce GT 1030 reaches 2,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W6150M is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GT 1030 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W6150M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 1030). Raw compute: 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1030).

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
G3D Mark Score
2,358
2,407+2%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768+100%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.651 TFLOPS+46%
1.127 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+33%
144 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 1030 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W6150M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W6150M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 1030 carries 2 GB. FirePro W6150M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W6150M and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1030. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W6150M) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 1030) — the GeForce GT 1030 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M) vs 12 (GeForce GT 1030). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
DirectX
12 (FL12_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M) vs None (GeForce GT 1030). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GT 1030).

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
Encoder
VCE 2.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W6150M draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 1030's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 1030 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W6150M) vs 300W (GeForce GT 1030). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 82mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
82mm
145mm
Height
105mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
15.7
80.2+411%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 1030 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
MSRP
—
$79
Codename
Saturn
GP108
Release
November 12 2015
May 17 2017
Ranking
#646
#641
Search FirePro W6150M on AmazonSearch GeForce GT 1030 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.