FirePro W6150M
VS
GeForce GT 1030

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GT 1030

FirePro W6150M

2015Core: 1075 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1030

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W6150M is positioned at rank #44 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W6150M

#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
94%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
93%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
93%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
85%
#29
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
501%
#44
FirePro W6150M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#48
Quadro K3100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400
97%
#50
Quadro K5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509
95%
#51
Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP: $200|Avg: $150
94%
#52
Quadro K4100M
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261
94%
#58
Quadro K2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 1030 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W6150M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 1030 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W6150M and GeForce GT 1030

AMD

FirePro W6150M

The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1030

The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W6150M scores 2,358 and the GeForce GT 1030 reaches 2,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W6150M is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GT 1030 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W6150M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 1030). Raw compute: 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1030).

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
G3D Mark Score
2,358
2,407+2%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768+100%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.651 TFLOPS+46%
1.127 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+33%
144 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W6150M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 1030 has 2 GB. The FirePro W6150M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W6150M) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 1030) — the GeForce GT 1030 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M) vs 12 (GeForce GT 1030). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
DirectX
12 (FL12_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M) vs None (GeForce GT 1030). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GT 1030).

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
Encoder
VCE 2.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W6150M draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 1030's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 1030 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W6150M) vs 300W (GeForce GT 1030). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 82mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
82mm
145mm
Height
105mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
15.7
80.2+411%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 1030 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W6150MGeForce GT 1030
MSRP
$79
Avg Price (30d)
$95
Codename
Saturn
GP108
Release
November 12 2015
May 17 2017
Ranking
#646
#641