FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GTX 485M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GTX 485M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GTX 485M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W6150M

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

GeForce GTX 485M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 485M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (2,360 vs 2,358), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W6150M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 485M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 485M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W6150M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W6150M vs GeForce GTX 485M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W6150M

The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.

GeForce GTX 485M

The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W6150M scores 2,358 and the GeForce GTX 485M reaches 2,360 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W6150M is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 485M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W6150M) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 485M). Raw compute: 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M).

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 485M
G3D Mark Score	2,358	2,360
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768+100%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.651 TFLOPS+87%	0.8832 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	48	64+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 485M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W6150M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 485M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W6150M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 485M carries 2 GB. FirePro W6150M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W6150M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W6150M) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 485M) — the GeForce GTX 485M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 485M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 485M
DirectX	12 (FL12_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+15%	4.0
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M).

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 485M
Encoder	VCE 2.0	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	UVD 4.2	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W6150M draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 485M's 100W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W6150M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 485M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.

Feature	FirePro W6150M	GeForce GTX 485M
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	82mm	—
Height	105mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-17%	90°C
Perf/Watt	15.7	23.6+50%