FirePro W6150M vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

FirePro W6150M

2015Core: 1075 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

2020Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W6150M vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W6150M vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W6150M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro W6150M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 435.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 28W.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 150W, a 122W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (2,400 vs 2,358), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W6150M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W6150M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W6150M vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W6150M

The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W6150M scores 2,358 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W6150M is built on GCN 2.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W6150M) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).

FeatureFirePro W6150MUHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
G3D Mark Score
2,358
2,400+2%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
768+1500%
48

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W6150MUHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W6150M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs carries 0 MB. FirePro W6150M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W6150M and System on the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.

FeatureFirePro W6150MUHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W6150MUHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
DirectX
12 (FL12_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M) vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).

FeatureFirePro W6150MUHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Encoder
VCE 2.0
Quick Sync (Tiger Lake)
Decoder
UVD 4.2
Quick Sync (Tiger Lake)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W6150M draws 150W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 137.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W6150M) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 82mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro W6150MUHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
TDP
150W
28W-81%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
82mm
0mm
Height
105mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85
Perf/Watt
15.7
85.7+446%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W6150MUHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
MSRP
$0
Codename
Saturn
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
November 12 2015
August 15 2020
Ranking
#646
#712

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.