
FirePro W6150M

Radeon RX 550X
FirePro W6150M vs Radeon RX 550X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W6150M vs Radeon RX 550X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W6150M vs Radeon RX 550X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W6150M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 145mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 550X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅FirePro W6150M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550X is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌76.8% longer card at 145mm vs 82mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W6150M vs Radeon RX 550X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W6150M
The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.

Radeon RX 550X
The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W6150M scores 2,358 and the Radeon RX 550X reaches 2,381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W6150M is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W6150M) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550X). Raw compute: 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X).
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,358 | 2,381 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.651 TFLOPS+36% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro W6150M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W6150M and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550X. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W6150M) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 550X) — the Radeon RX 550X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 550X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M) vs UVD (Radeon RX 550X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X).
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W6150M draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 550X's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 550X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W6150M) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 82mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 82mm | 145mm |
| Height | 105mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 15.7 | 47.6+203% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 550X (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $109 |
| Codename | Saturn | Lexa |
| Release | November 12 2015 | December 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #646 | #642 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















