GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R7 250X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R7 250X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R7 250X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅105.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
101% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 22.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.

Radeon R7 250X

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 100.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 105.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (2,275 vs 2,269), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 100.5% (22.9 vs 11.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 250X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R7 250X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon R7 250X

The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon R7 250X
G3D Mark Score	2,275	2,269
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	640+90%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS	1.216 TFLOPS+34%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	448 KB+180%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 250X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon R7 250X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250X carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 250X gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the GeForce GTX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon R7 250X
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB	2 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	72 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 460) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon R7 250X
Encoder	—	VCE 1.0
Decoder	—	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R7 250X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon R7 250X
TDP	160W	80W-50%
Recommended PSU	450W	400W-11%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	—	210mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	14.2	28.4+100%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 came in at $199, while the Radeon R7 250X launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250X was 50.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 22.9 (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon R7 250X offers 100.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 250X (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Radeon R7 250X
MSRP	$199	$99-50%
Performance per Dollar	11.4	22.9+101%
Codename	GF104	Cape Verde
Release	July 12 2010	February 13 2014
Ranking	#652	#655

Search GeForce GTX 460 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 250X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.