FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 460

FirePro V7900

2011Core: 725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460

2010Core: 675 MHz

FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 460 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V7900

2011

Why buy it

  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 402% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 405.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 460 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (2,275 vs 2,261), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V7900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 768 MB of VRAM and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $800 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 405.1% (11.4 vs 2.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V7900 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V7900

The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7900 scores 2,261 and the GeForce GTX 460 reaches 2,275 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 460 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7900) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460).

FeatureFirePro V7900GeForce GTX 460
G3D Mark Score
2,261
2,275
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1280+281%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS+105%
0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+43%
56
L1 Cache
320 KB
448 KB+40%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro V7900GeForce GTX 460
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V7900 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 carries 768 MB. FirePro V7900 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7900 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460.

FeatureFirePro V7900GeForce GTX 460
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+167%
0.75 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 460).

FeatureFirePro V7900GeForce GTX 460
Encoder
None
Decoder
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7900 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 460's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The FirePro V7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7900) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureFirePro V7900GeForce GTX 460
TDP
150W-6%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
279mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
100°C
Perf/Watt
15.1+6%
14.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V7900 came in at $999, while the GeForce GTX 460 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 460 was 80.1% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (FirePro V7900) vs 11.4 (GeForce GTX 460) — the GeForce GTX 460 offers 395.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V7900 (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro V7900GeForce GTX 460
MSRP
$999
$199-80%
Performance per Dollar
2.3
11.4+396%
Codename
Cayman
GF104
Release
May 24 2011
July 12 2010
Ranking
#656
#652

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.