
FirePro V7900

FirePro V8800
FirePro V7900 vs FirePro V8800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7900 vs FirePro V8800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7900 vs FirePro V8800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 74W.
FirePro V8800
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 74W instead of 150W, a 76W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7900 vs FirePro V8800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7900
The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.

FirePro V8800
The FirePro V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,281 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7900 scores 2,261 and the FirePro V8800 reaches 2,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the FirePro V8800 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7900) vs 800 (FirePro V8800). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V8800).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,261 | 2,281 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+60% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+68% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+300% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7900 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V8800 carries 4 GB. FirePro V8800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7900 and 64-bit on the FirePro V8800. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7900) vs 256 KB (FirePro V8800) — the FirePro V7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7900) vs 11.2 (FirePro V8800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7900) vs None (FirePro V8800). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8800).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7900 draws 150W versus the FirePro V8800's 74W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7900) vs 350W (FirePro V8800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 100°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 74W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 100°C | 85°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 15.1 | 30.8+104% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V7900 came in at $999, while the FirePro V8800 launched at $1499. On MSRP, FirePro V7900 was 33.4% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (FirePro V7900) vs 1.5 (FirePro V8800) — the FirePro V7900 offers 53.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V7900 (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-33% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3+53% | 1.5 |
| Codename | Cayman | Juniper |
| Release | May 24 2011 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #656 | #780 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














