FirePro V7900 vs Radeon R7 250X

FirePro V7900

2011Core: 725 MHz

Radeon R7 250X

2014Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro V7900

150

2,261

0.0%

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Radeon R7 250X

2,269

+0.4%

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V7900 is positioned at rank #279 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7900

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

93%

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

92%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

88%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

88%

#264

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

6537%

#279

FirePro V7900

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

100%

#280

GRID P6-4Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

98%

#281

GRID M60-8A

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

98%

#283

Quadro K4000

MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100

95%

#285

GRID P4-2Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235

93%

#287

Tesla C2070

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38

92%

#289

Quadro 2000 D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

92%

#290

FirePro V5900

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

91%

#291

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

89%

#294

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 250X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V7900.

Insight	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 250X
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (279mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 250X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 250X holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $120), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 301.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 250X
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+301.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro V7900 Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 250X Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7900 and Radeon R7 250X

FirePro V7900

The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.

Radeon R7 250X

The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7900 scores 2,261 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7900) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).

Feature	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 250X
G3D Mark Score	2,261	2,269
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+100%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS+53%	1.216 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L1 Cache	320 KB+100%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 250X
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7900) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the FirePro V7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 250X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7900) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 250X
DirectX	11.2	12 (FL 11_1)+7%
Vulkan	None	1.2
OpenGL	4.4	4.6+5%
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7900) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X).

Feature	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 250X
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 3.1	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7900 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon R7 250X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7900) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 100°C vs 70°C.

Feature	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 250X
TDP	150W	80W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	279mm	210mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	100°C	70°C-30%
Perf/Watt	15.1	28.4+88%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro V7900 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon R7 250X launched at $99 and now averages $30. The Radeon R7 250X costs 75% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.8 (FirePro V7900) vs 75.6 (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon R7 250X offers 302.1% better value. The Radeon R7 250X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).