
FirePro V7900

GeForce MX150
FirePro V7900 vs GeForce MX150 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7900 vs GeForce MX150 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7900 vs GeForce MX150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌566% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 150W vs 10W.
GeForce MX150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $849 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 563.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 150W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7900 vs GeForce MX150 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7900
The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.

GeForce MX150
The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7900 scores 2,261 and the GeForce MX150 reaches 2,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce MX150 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7900) vs 384 (GeForce MX150). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,261 | 2,252 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+133% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+122% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX150 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7900 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX150.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7900) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_1)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7900) vs No (GeForce MX150). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7900 draws 150W versus the GeForce MX150's 10W — a 175% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7900) vs 350W (GeForce MX150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 100°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 10W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 100°C | 75°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 15.1 | 225.2+1391% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V7900 came in at $999, while the GeForce MX150 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce MX150 was 85% cheaper ($849 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (FirePro V7900) vs 15.0 (GeForce MX150) — the GeForce MX150 offers 552.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX150 (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $150-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | 15.0+552% |
| Codename | Cayman | GP108 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #656 | #657 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














