
FirePro D500

FirePro V7900
FirePro D500 vs FirePro V7900 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro D500 vs FirePro V7900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro D500 vs FirePro V7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro D500
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌82.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 150W.
FirePro V7900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 274W, a 124W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌99.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro D500 vs FirePro V7900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro D500
The FirePro D500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,272 points.

FirePro V7900
The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro D500 scores 2,272 and the FirePro V7900 reaches 2,261 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D500 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro V7900 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (FirePro D500) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7900). Raw compute: 2.227 TFLOPS (FirePro D500) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,272 | 2,261 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.227 TFLOPS+20% | 1.856 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+20% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D500 | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro D500 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7900 carries 2 GB. FirePro D500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro D500 and 64-bit on the FirePro V7900. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro D500) vs 512 KB (FirePro V7900) — the FirePro D500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D500) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7900). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D500) vs None (FirePro V7900). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro D500) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D500 draws 274W versus the FirePro V7900's 150W — a 58.5% difference. The FirePro V7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D500) vs 350W (FirePro V7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 279mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 100°C.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 279mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-25% | 100°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.3 | 15.1+82% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro D500 came in at $500, while the FirePro V7900 launched at $999. On MSRP, FirePro D500 was 49.9% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro D500) vs 2.3 (FirePro V7900) — the FirePro D500 offers 95.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro D500 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-50% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5+96% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Cayman |
| Release | January 18 2014 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #484 | #656 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














